Working Groups
Zombie Claims
- Research how Zombie Misinformation functions, what it means, how it works and why one time debunking does not work.
- Research wikipedia as a source for zombie misinformation
- Build tech to support research on zombie misinformation
- Work with Meedan’s claim matching tech to effectively kill zombie claims
- Wikipedia as a source for zombie misinformation
- Create Topic related fact check sites
- Build tech for detecting claim matching and similarity
- Hold platforms accountable and tell them tools they can use
- Tell platforms that they can use these systems
- Make this tech available for big and small platforms
Reduce Debunking Latency
- Work with Meedan’s check tipline to tackle this
- Create popup news rooms around specific events
- Anticipating Misinformation and prebunking
- Create database of fact checks
- Use machine learning tools for detection
- Make this data available to different audiences (newsroom, individuals)
- Solve for claims reappearing in multiple languages by pre-translating every factcheck
Platform Failure
- Explore whether self regulation can work. If not then how do you fix it with regulation?
- Compile the tech solutions that we should advocate for.
- Study How do people exploit anonymity to spread misinformation? Can we rely on algorithmic mechanisms for reducing virality from anonymous sources/ platforms?
- Think about tactics that leverage regulatory arbitrage (across geographies).
Liberation from Big tech Platforms
- Create a data donation service
- Create a traceable archive for communities
- Archive for fact checked content (?)
- Build a tool that lets you post on short video platforms while also keeping local archives of content produced.
Producing Content
- Create a Narrative show that shows how information or misinformation is a part of our daily family life. Beyond media literacy that is framed as wrong action.
- Create Educational curriculum for different age levels.
- Create content to different languages
- Study influencer educators to understand how they straddle objectivity and subjectivity
- Create content in multiple formats so the audiences can have a choice on what format they want to access the ‘fact check’ in.
- Ideate on Digital storytelling for fact checked content beyond long-form text storytelling
- Provide a digest to creators on what topics to tackle
Increasing reach of Fact Checks
- SEO training
- Study and implement UI tweaks that work for different demographics
Source Tracking
- Think about citational justice in terms of wikipedia
- Can you use a metadata tag/ poisoning to track networks.
- Libraries and archives are thinking of this in context of provenance and AI
MIA Data
- A crowdsourced data directory
- Pre-internet Tata used to create a dataset
- Build Archives with access controls
- See if we can join the factly project
- Activating networks for maintaining/cleaning datasets
Data Void
- Assist Meedan's work on gendered disinformation:
- Definitions are a problem (one form of a gender based violence)
- Identifying gendered disinformation (support on tech for contextual detection).
Critical Reading
- Make Media literacy curriculum content (targeted for age groups for critical thinking)
- Keeping updated based on research
- Work with those involved in existing curriculum
- Tabulating list of existing curriculum
- Cataloging ‘misinformation techniques’ (informal logics)
Please email misinfocon_support@tattle.co.in to be added to our mailing list.